Hi Stan: (Tried to post this a day ago. Looks like it didn't take)
To my questions, I am sort of getting back into the swing of things by working my way through the manual. My method entails reading the manual and validating my understanding of the how the program works by comparing my results to the results used as examples in the manual.
In the manual I'm at the "predictions" section now between what would be “3g” and “Show As” in the manual outline and have a few questions relating to some of my charts not conforming to the sample charts in the manual. Starting first with the charts and tables that do conform, the first table, i.e., the one with multiple colors at Position 2 and the second table, i.e., the table created after running the six step prediction analysis both conform completely to the sample table in the book.
We are then advised:
"If we let the predictor scan the whole database of past winning numbers then it will find the best matching pattern in draws 2006/23 Sun 2nd to 2006/24 Wed 2nd. Their numbers are 12, 16 and 30." …
When I run this instruction I get a table showing a complete listing of the 960 numbers and within the table the numbers 12, 16 and 30 at position 2 between 2006/23 Sun 2nd to 2006/24 Wed 2nd in the list. However, the range itself is not identified in any particular way either in the table or in the chart by the highlighting, marking or other indicator demonstrating that it has been found, selected or otherwise specifically identified by the predictor.
Next,
"What happens if we increase the pattern size from three numbers to 10 numbers? The latest pattern is then 6,11,11,23,15,6,18,13,13,29. When displayed in a chart the numbers look like this:" (chart omitted.)
When I run that instruction changing the select dialogue to choose All 960 numbers I get a gray chart 14 numbers with plot points at 12, 21, 15, 12, 18, 6, 11, 11, 23, 18, 13, 13, 29 and the number 11 at prediction. The draw range is from 2010\25 Wed 2nd to 2010\28 Wed 2nd t. the year 2006 does not show up in the chart. (Of course there is a different set of 14 numbers in the chart at position 1 but there too they do not match the numbers referenced above.)
Sorry about the overly long post but I am a bit stumped here and am trying to move on. Please advise.