NEW FILTER: Unique Digits

[timmac]

Unique Digits Filter

Status: Beta
Version 1.7.3
Known Issues: None
Supported: Statistics, Ticket Analyser, Custom Analyser, Ticket Properties


This will appear in the Category ".Tim Mac Filters" at the top

This filter will count the number of unique digits in the ticket. An unique digit being the digit counted only one. For example, in the ticket 02-06-08-18-51 (ignoring bonus) the digits are 2,6,8,1,8,5,1 (ignore zeros). The unique digits are 2,6,8,1,5 so the total is 5.

You can set the Min and Max of the number of unique digits.

Example: Min 2, Max 5

1-2-3-4-5-6 REJECTED (unique digits 6 (1,2,3,4,5,6))
10-12-26-38-49 REJECTED (unique digits 7 (ignore 0) (1,2,6,3,8,4,9))
10-12-16-19-20 ACCEPTED (unique digits 4 (1,2,6,9))

Works in Package Reduce and analysis and winning ticket properties

PLEASE FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS IN THREAD "How To Install Plugin" for installation instructions

[Neener]

timmac, Thank you for this fabulous filter!

I downloaded & when I tried to install, it said there was an error & could not install.
I ran the update for EL5 & tried again. This time it said it was already installed.
I tried the filter & it does work perfectly. Thank you so much again.

Neener

[timmac]

timmac, Thank you for this fabulous filter!

I downloaded & when I tried to install, it said there was an error & could not install.
I ran the update for EL5 & tried again. This time it said it was already installed.
I tried the filter & it does work perfectly. Thank you so much again.

Neener

Hi
Thanks, the upload is fixed for future downloads!
I expect to be adding a good number of digit filters to this NBM so keep an eye out for updates

[andthen]

hi Tim
I would love to use your filters but find them not possible to use because they don't work in a complex filter...have you had a chance to look at this issue yet?

Cheers

[liviu]

Independent Digits Filter

Status: Beta
Version 1.0.0
Known Issues: Custom Analyzer settings not remembered
Supported: Statistics, Ticket Analyser


This will appear in the Category "Tim Mac Filters 2" at the top

This filter will count the number of independent digits in the ticket. An independent digit being the digit counted only one. For example, in the ticket 02-06-08-18-51 (ignoring bonus) the digits are 2,6,8,1,8,5,1 (ignore zeros). The unique digits are 2,6,8,1,5 so the total is 5.

You can set the Min and Max of the number of unique independent digits.

Example: Min 2, Max 5

1-2-3-4-5-6 ACCEPTED (independent digits 6 (1,2,3,4,5,6))
10-12-26-38-49 REJECTED (independent digits 7 (ignore 0) (1,2,6,3,8,4,9))
10-12-16-19-20 ACCEPTED (independent digits 4 (1,2,6,9))

Works in Package Reduce and analysis and winning ticket properties

Hi Tim,
many thanks;just one question for my understanding
In your example we have:
Example: Min 2, Max 5

1-2-3-4-5-6 ACCEPTED (independent digits 6 (1,2,3,4,5,6))
10-12-26-38-49 REJECTED (independent digits 7 (ignore 0) (1,2,6,3,8,4,9))
10-12-16-19-20 ACCEPTED (independent digits 4 (1,2,6,9))

So , we have Min 2, Max 5, but first ticket was accepted and have 6 independent digits; could you pls let me know if it is a mistake or I didn't understood how it function this filter..

Many Tx,
regards,
Liviu

[timmac]

Hi Tim,
many thanks;just one question for my understanding
In your example we have:
Example: Min 2, Max 5

1-2-3-4-5-6 ACCEPTED (independent digits 6 (1,2,3,4,5,6))
10-12-26-38-49 REJECTED (independent digits 7 (ignore 0) (1,2,6,3,8,4,9))
10-12-16-19-20 ACCEPTED (independent digits 4 (1,2,6,9))

So , we have Min 2, Max 5, but first ticket was accepted and have 6 independent digits; could you pls let me know if it is a mistake or I didn't understood how it function this filter..

Many Tx,
regards,
Liviu

Hi Liviu

Yes, sorry, that is a mistake in the example - the first ticket should be REJECTED (6 digits when max is 5)

I'll correct original post

Regards

[timmac]

hi Tim
I would love to use your filters but find them not possible to use because they don't work in a complex filter...have you had a chance to look at this issue yet?

Cheers

Hi
Yes, this issue is now fixed in v1.0.3 so you can use in a complex filter

Cheers