Match Number Movements With Latest Result

Postby Joe » Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:58 pm

jerzy, please try this example which i posted today, http://www.expertlotto.com/en/forum/for ... ge=2#11536
I made some mis-calculation in my previous version and explanations, sorry,

try it now, thanks
Joe
 
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Postby Jerzy » Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:07 pm

Joe,

If the number movement is calculated as you have shown in the second example, back-testing works correctly with movement count 6 - 6. It can identify the latest jackpot.

However, using the Leave setting and movement count 6 - 6 or 5 - 6 for filtering removes all combinations from the package. The jackpot identified by backtest, which is present in the package, is removed together with all other tickets.

Using the Leave and movement count 4 -6 leaves 820 tickets in the package and the last jackpot ticket is in it.
Jerzy
 
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:26 am

Postby Joe » Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:16 pm

[quote=Jerzy]
However, using the Leave setting and movement count 6 - 6 or 5 - 6 for filtering removes all combinations from the package. The jackpot identified by backtest, which is present in the package, is removed together with all other tickets.

Using the Leave and movement count 4 -6 leaves 820 tickets in the package and the last jackpot ticket is in it.
[/quote] Jerzy, I think you didn't skip the latest result before you apply the filter with that settings, just note down the movements and skip the latest result and run the filter, it will work fine thanks
Joe
 
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Postby Jerzy » Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:34 pm

Joe,

After skipping the latest result, the filtering seems to be correct. And of course, to find the latest jackpot on backtesting the latest result shouldn't be skipped.

It works OK in both match number movement with the latest result filters.

I wonder how Match Distance with the Latest Result works if there are 2 the same movement values but in opposite directions, e.g. -10 and +10. We are going to enter only one value 10 in the Match Distance, and only 5, not 6 values will be entered.

Thank you for your help.
Jerzy
 
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:26 am

Postby Joe » Fri Nov 28, 2008 3:36 pm

great, enjoy my new filter "Match Summary Difference" filter too, thanks
Joe
 
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Postby teoman » Fri Nov 28, 2008 4:09 pm

[quote=Joe:1227715288]
New Version(1.0.2) of "Match Number Movements with latest" has been added.
Bugs fixed.[/quote]
The Match Number Movement with Latest Result and
the Match Number Distance with Latest Result have different reductions in the Number Position 2, 3, 4, 5 of items front panel of Statistics >Table movement number at the same position. Comparative reductions are:

pos.1 => 10.721.193 - 10.721.193
pos.2 => 8.694.413 - 12.036.024
pos.3 => 6.188.182 - 12.036.024
pos.4 => 7.589.582 - 12.036.024
pos.5 => 8.350.342 - 12.036.024
pos.6 => 11.223.135 - 11.223.135

You can see this on pos.2 and image attached.

Thanks!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
teoman
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:27 pm

Postby Joe » Fri Nov 28, 2008 4:14 pm

Teoman, please dont get confused, statistics movement and my number movements are different, I get the number movement only with the latest result, so the movement will be differ from movements in statistics,
Joe
 
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Postby teoman » Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:22 pm

[quote=Joe]
Teoman, please dont get confused, statistics movement and my number movements are different, I get the number movement only with the latest result, so the movement will be differ from movements in statistics,
[/quote]
Joe, please excuse me, but position 1 and 6 are correct, only positions 2, 3, 4, 5 are not correct, are all equal, is that correct?

Thank you very much for useful filters, distributed with great generosity!
teoman
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:27 pm

Postby Joe » Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:27 pm

[quote=teoman]but position 1 and 6 are correct, only positions 2, 3, 4, 5 are not correct, are all equal[/quote]sorry I am not sure what you telling about these positions, where the position 2,3,4,5 are not correct, can you explain it with an example so that I can understand your opinion, thanks
Joe
 
Posts: 1227
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:51 pm
Location: Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Postby Jerzy » Sat Nov 29, 2008 2:27 am

teoman,

The image that you attached shows the same package reduction for the position 2 for both filters.
Jerzy
 
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:26 am

Postby teoman » Sat Nov 29, 2008 3:19 am

[quote=Jerzy]
teoman,

The image that you attached shows the same package reduction for the position 2 for both filters.[/quote]
Hi Jerzy,

Yes, for both filters.
teoman
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:27 pm

Postby Jerzy » Sat Nov 29, 2008 3:35 am

teoman,

There is no difference between the results of filtering by both filters. What is wrong with the filters that you want to show us?
Jerzy
 
Posts: 811
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:26 am

Postby teoman » Sat Nov 29, 2008 11:55 am

[quote=Jerzy]
teoman,

There is no difference between the results of filtering by both filters. What is wrong with the filters that you want to show us?[/quote]
Hi Jerzy,

Excuse me, I thought are similar to Statistics>Table movement number where you can set a group of more than differences in each position.

Good luck!
teoman
 
Posts: 191
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:27 pm

Previous

Return to Plugin Development

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests