ExpertLotto.com

Hi All,


Here I tried new filter "Distinct of History Differences in Columns"

Using this You can able filter the combinations which having distinct counts of HDs in each Columns.

Thanks

Please don't use this plug-in, I will re-check the coding the fix the bug, please wait.
Thanks

Now, here is the plug-in, Fixed the bug(major bug Sorry ),

Here is the Distinct of HDs for my latest 13 results,

6,5,6,5,4,4,4,5,6,6,5
4,6,6,6,6,4,4,6,5,5,6
5,4,5,4,6,5,6,6,6,5,4
6,5,5,6,5,5,5,4,4,6,6
4,6,4,6,4,3,5,5,5,6,4
5,3,5,5,4,5,5,4,4,6,6
6,6,4,5,4,5,5,4,4,6,6
5,5,6,4,5,4,6,4,6,5,5
2,5,6,5,5,4,5,6,6,6,5
6,4,5,5,5,5,6,5,5,5,5
6,6,5,5,4,4,6,5,6,6,6
6,3,5,5,4,6,3,6,6,5,6
6,5,6,5,6,5,3,5,6,6,5

If I filter the Whole package with this parameters, I am end up with only 100 to 350 tickets that retain Jackpot tickets,

You can try this yourself and let me know how much you end up?.

If we can predict the parameters as much, I hope the JP is in your hand.

awaiting for your suggestions, Thanks

Joe,

Could you please explain what the Distict of HDs is and how you calculate it.

Jerzy

Joe,

The Distinct of History Differences in Columns filter is listed in Lottery --> Preferences --> Plugins as HdSumOfNumberPositions filter. Is it right? Why two names for one filter?

[quote=Jerzy]
Joe,

The Distinct of History Differences in Columns filter is listed in Lottery --> Preferences --> Plugins as HdSumOfNumberPositions filter. Is it right? Why two names for one filter?
[/quote]

Yeah There must be some mistake, I check it Thanks.

[quote=Joe]
Here is the Distinct of HDs for my latest 13 results,

6,5,6,5,4,4,4,5,6,6,5
4,6,6,6,6,4,4,6,5,5,6
5,4,5,4,6,5,6,6,6,5,4
6,5,5,6,5,5,5,4,4,6,6
4,6,4,6,4,3,5,5,5,6,4
5,3,5,5,4,5,5,4,4,6,6
6,6,4,5,4,5,5,4,4,6,6
5,5,6,4,5,4,6,4,6,5,5
2,5,6,5,5,4,5,6,6,6,5
6,4,5,5,5,5,6,5,5,5,5
6,6,5,5,4,4,6,5,6,6,6
6,3,5,5,4,6,3,6,6,5,6
6,5,6,5,6,5,3,5,6,6,5

If I filter the Whole package with this parameters, I am end up with only 100 to 350 tickets that retain Jackpot tickets,

You can try this yourself and let me know how much you end up?.

If we can predict the parameters as much, I hope the JP is in your hand.

awaiting for your suggestions, Thanks
[/quote]

Joe,

Can you upload an image of your sample settings. I am working your new filter and can't get a good sample of settings. Either I get 100% passed or 100% fail in my backtests.

Thanks,
CSenior

Hi

Here is the plug-in, please download this and replace the old one,

Thanks

OK, how do you use this?

Hi,

Here, how you can use this filter,

Lets consider the Winning Numbers, 11, 23, 32, 39, 42, 46.

For this Winning combination, the history differences in Column 0 are, 01, 17, 02, 07, 07, 06. (see the picture)

The distinct of there HDs is 5 ( eliminated the duplicate 07).

Now if you place, Column 0's Distinct Hd as 5, you can able to filter more combinations,

I hope this is clear now, if not let me know,

Thanks,

[quote=CSenior]
[quote=Joe]
Here is the Distinct of HDs for my latest 13 results,

6,5,6,5,4,4,4,5,6,6,5
4,6,6,6,6,4,4,6,5,5,6
5,4,5,4,6,5,6,6,6,5,4
6,5,5,6,5,5,5,4,4,6,6
4,6,4,6,4,3,5,5,5,6,4
5,3,5,5,4,5,5,4,4,6,6
6,6,4,5,4,5,5,4,4,6,6
5,5,6,4,5,4,6,4,6,5,5
2,5,6,5,5,4,5,6,6,6,5
6,4,5,5,5,5,6,5,5,5,5
6,6,5,5,4,4,6,5,6,6,6
6,3,5,5,4,6,3,6,6,5,6
6,5,6,5,6,5,3,5,6,6,5

If I filter the Whole package with this parameters, I am end up with only 100 to 350 tickets that retain Jackpot tickets,

You can try this yourself and let me know how much you end up?.

If we can predict the parameters as much, I hope the JP is in your hand.

awaiting for your suggestions, Thanks
[/quote]

Joe,

Can you upload an image of your sample settings. I am working your new filter and can't get a good sample of settings. Either I get 100% passed or 100% fail in my backtests.

Thanks,
CSenior
[/quote]

Joe,

Nevermind. I kept on ticking more than one tick per column. That is why I kept getting 100% pass or fail. Using one tick per column will get you better results.

Thanks Joe! Another excellent filter!

CSenior

[quote=CSenior]
Joe,

Nevermind. I kept on ticking more than one tick per column. That is why I kept getting 100% pass or fail. Using one tick per column will get you better results.

Thanks Joe! Another excellent filter!

CSenior
[/quote]

Thanks Senior, Please use the updated plug-in, so that you can make use of this filter in compound/group filters,

if you use the exact Distinct HDs for Each columns, you will be left with few number of combinations from the whole package that includes jackpot,

And if you can predict all column's distinct HDs for next result, I am sure Jackpot is yours,

All the Best,

Thanks

Hi Joe,

This makes more sense, however, you lost me at...

[quote=Joe]
The distinct of there HDs is 5 ( eliminated the duplicate 07).
[/quote]

I understand that I have to do this for all 11 columns,right?
I don't know, however, why is the distinct HD 5... :wand:

What would be the HD for col0 in my case - see attached image.

Then, on your plugin, how do I enter this?
I understand that the first check box on the left represents the column - 0 to -10 - the rest are the values that the HD can take, from 1 to 6.
What do you put under count - min/max?

Can you, please, elaborate a bit? There was probably another thread on this but I might have missed it.

Thanks a lot,

Laurentiu

Hi laurontario,

Let me explain this little bit clear,

Here I present history differences for one of my latest result, and the distinct HDs (Distinct is nothing but counting the numbers without duplicates in an array)

Col-- HD Distinct Count of HD
0 02,14,07,09,03,13 -------- 6
-1 01,06,03,01,03,06 -------- 3
-2 01,32,07,03,07,06 -------- 5
-3 29,01,10,06,01,13 -------- 5
-4 03,01,05,01,14,03 -------- 4
-5 11,10,12,08,13,01 -------- 6
-6 06,06,08,04,04,06 -------- 3
-7 13,08,05,06,01,48 -------- 6
-8 11,15,12,07,05,20 -------- 6
-9 05,49,03,08,08,06 -------- 5
-10 13,06,02,14,07,04 -------- 6

Now, In filter you can set the exact Distinct counts of Hd with corresponding Columns and Count min/max 11/11 (setting all columns must pass) and leave
you will be left with only few number of combinations including JP,

Hope Its clear now, if not, let know

Thanks