Thanks Tdnl46w. I realized my wrong reasoning.

"-+++++-+-+-

-++++++-+-+-

-++++++-+-+-"

of course, in the previous txt it is not possible to set "At least [3] patterns must pass".

but in the next txt (if I'm wrong please correct me),

we can set "At least [1or 2or 3 or 4 or 5] patterns must pass".

Each pattern addresses different levels, so even if it is unlikely to confirm such a pattern as a whole, the E.L. can accept set "At least [5] patterns must pass".

"-+........

..-+.......

....-+.....

......-+...

........-+."

As for creating Segment Differences Sum Movement Patterns from a latest draw by the Automation plugin, I am certainly waiting for the possible guide you mentioned in the previous post. But at first I tried to understand basically how to generate combinations of patterns. png1

1.png

Starting and examining the output file, it is clear that in the set of Levels min3-max10, the filter does not deal with Levels 0,1 and 2 (png2)

2.png

Also the Pattern size 5 we see that in the output txt file it gives us sequences with 5 (+-=) signs

What I noticed is that the filter definitely does not give ALL the possible combinations of (+-=) signs. So somehow the filter makes a choice about which combinations to keep.

I imagine that there may be some statistical basis in all this. Do you have any idea? Thank you very much!

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.