Ranks for WNH differences
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2015 12:51 pm
Hi everyone,
What do you guys think of an idea that history differences could have ranks and can be filtered by them ?
What do I mean by that... say that one has 6 levels and differences are going from level 0 to 5 as follows: -10, +5, +8, -25, +20, +1.
Then - given the current example - ranks would be ordered in such a way that the highest value would get rank 1 and the lowest value would get rank 6.
Like this: -10 (5), +5 (3), +8 (2), -25 (6), +20 (1), +1 (4); --- 5, 3, 2, 6, 1, 4.
Now an example of how one could filter: let's say that you look at rank statistics and you find that level 4 has not produced rank 1 nor 2 for a long time.
Then one should be able to open a corresponding filter and be able to mark rank 1 and/or 2 for level 4.
PS: If for an example there are two highest differences with the same value then they both receive rank 1, and so on.
What do you guys think of an idea that history differences could have ranks and can be filtered by them ?
What do I mean by that... say that one has 6 levels and differences are going from level 0 to 5 as follows: -10, +5, +8, -25, +20, +1.
Then - given the current example - ranks would be ordered in such a way that the highest value would get rank 1 and the lowest value would get rank 6.
Like this: -10 (5), +5 (3), +8 (2), -25 (6), +20 (1), +1 (4); --- 5, 3, 2, 6, 1, 4.
Now an example of how one could filter: let's say that you look at rank statistics and you find that level 4 has not produced rank 1 nor 2 for a long time.
Then one should be able to open a corresponding filter and be able to mark rank 1 and/or 2 for level 4.
PS: If for an example there are two highest differences with the same value then they both receive rank 1, and so on.