edymurph wrote:So the answers with the big numbers have to be divided by 2, for example:
865,276-866,362 = 1086/2 (543)
866.362-867.438 = 1076/2 (538)
867,438-868,502 = 1064/2 (532)
and so on.
tdnl46w wrote:Not sure if it has been mentioned yet but just wanted to note. These stats are generated from each draw comparing to any other draws. While EL can analyze and filter stats like these, using a draw list(package)in this way would limit the use of some important EL features such as, charting moving averages, back-test's, winning numbers history and finding patterns(etc). In other words, the way EL features are setup, it might be more advantageous to use a chronological draw order.
D1Magnet wrote:Hi edymurprh
Thank you very much for your reply and attached spreadsheet on calculations for level 9
With your crazy calculations spreadsheet, I see how you’re using 526 (which is half 1052) as your standard figure for calculations. Multiplied by the numbers such as 1033, 1024 etc and this is coming up with the answer you mentioned you’d use in parentheses eg (543 , 538 etc)
Also how you’re using 1,051,050 multiplied by 1033,1024 etc and this comes up with (the first 4 numbers of) 1086,1076, 1064 etc.
Also with the divisions of 19 (the first 2 digits of the numbers) are close to the green column of numbers that were around 50, they seem to be 1 number over if you count the first 2 digits.edymurph wrote:So the answers with the big numbers have to be divided by 2, for example:
865,276-866,362 = 1086/2 (543)
866.362-867.438 = 1076/2 (538)
867,438-868,502 = 1064/2 (532)
and so on.
Thanks, I also see how you’re also coming up with the numbers such as 1086, 1076 etc
From the spreadsheet I posted that tried to find a good percentage figure to use, it seemed to have 1 (or maybe 2) out of the set of 10 (eg 1640-1650) that was usable.
If the formula you were looking for found 1/10 as being correct (or very close to), but if you knew which one was more likely to be accurate, would that be suitable as a prediction to use, or would you require all 10 answers to be accurate to know you had a winning formula?
(Obviously having all 10 would be ideal )
And yes finding a pattern for the 9 value should help you in finding a pattern to use on, eg level 8 & 10 if you were using the Match Winning Numbers Filter.
Thanks
D1Magnet wrote:tdnl46w wrote:Not sure if it has been mentioned yet but just wanted to note. These stats are generated from each draw comparing to any other draws. While EL can analyze and filter stats like these, using a draw list(package)in this way would limit the use of some important EL features such as, charting moving averages, back-test's, winning numbers history and finding patterns(etc). In other words, the way EL features are setup, it might be more advantageous to use a chronological draw order.
Hi tdnl46w, thanks for your suggestion, that seems like a good idea to try similar research on the last 1800 or so lotofacil draws. Then you should get a direct prediction number to input into the Match Winning Numbers filter.
D1Magnet wrote:Hi edymurph, thank you for your reply, it looks like from your crazy calculations spreadsheet that your division by 19, came close to estimating the answers (the answers around 50 being over by about 1)
Also (the easier way) how the subtracted differences from the 860,000 ish numbers gave them also, but as you mentioned these answers were known in advance.
As tdnl46w mentioned, chronological order, just meant the winning numbers table with the drawn dates in order.
With the numbers 1033,1024, 1012, 1056, 938 etc where did these numbers come from? I didn’t notice any pattern from the 860,000 ish numbers divided by 1,051,000
Thanks
D1Magnet wrote: ... Do you know of any way to display the whatif feature on the repeating numbers anaylzer statistics via a complex filter’s performance feature? ...
edymurph wrote:It is difficult to find or create something solid to always arrive at a concrete answer ..
D1Magnet wrote:Hi edymurph, thank you very much for explaining where the 1033,1024, 1012, 1056, 938 etc figures come from.edymurph wrote:It is difficult to find or create something solid to always arrive at a concrete answer ..
I’m working on another different idea to try and give an input prediction for the next number to enter into the Match Winning Numbers filter
Thanks
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest