Page 2 of 2
Posted:
Tue Oct 18, 2005 12:34 am
by Paulo
Hi Stan,
The build 651 solves the problem of the function WIN COVERAGE?
Thanks,
Paulo
Posted:
Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 am
by stan
[quote=Paulo]
Hi Stan,
The build 651 solves the problem of the function WIN COVERAGE?
Thanks,
Paulo
[/quote]
no, it doesn't. i'm sorry but i didn't have time to look at your problem yet. i'll let you know in this thread when i'll have some fix for you.
Posted:
Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:18 pm
by Paulo
Hi Stan,
Another software exists some that has this function WIN COVERAGE for
these parameters:
numbers = 6 even 100
pick = 2 even 50
match = 2 even 50
hits = 2 even 50
combinations = maximum
Until today, i only found the Expertlotto.
Thanks,
Paulo
Posted:
Thu Oct 20, 2005 3:11 pm
by stan
ok, and what software is it?
Posted:
Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:16 pm
by Paulo
Stan,
Sory, i translate my message. :wand:
This is my question:
Exist another software?
Thanks,
Paulo
Posted:
Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:04 pm
by stan
i see
i don't know if there's other software that can calculate coverage for large combinations but have a look here:
http://www.lotto-logix.com/lottosoft.html
it's a nice collection of almost all lottery software available on the net.
(and i promise i'll look at your bug this weekend
)
Posted:
Thu Oct 20, 2005 8:40 pm
by Paulo
Hi Stan,
Thanks.
Paulo :gun:
Posted:
Fri Oct 21, 2005 2:51 pm
by stan
i tried to calculate the win coverage for the file you sent and i had no problems. the resulting table is attached.
Posted:
Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:05 pm
by Paulo
Hi Stan,
Excellent!
Without any change in the program?
Posted:
Fri Oct 21, 2005 4:23 pm
by stan
yes, i haven't done any changes in the win coverage code so i have no idea why you got those wrong results. however i did notice that your exported coverage report has some extra columns so it's very strange.
can you pls try to calculate the same coverage report on your maching again?
Posted:
Fri Oct 21, 2005 6:20 pm
by Paulo
:wand:
Ok.
Posted:
Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:25 am
by Paulo
Hi Stan,
Now is PERFECT!!!!!!!!!
Thanks
Posted:
Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:24 am
by stan
[quote=Paulo]
Now is PERFECT!!!!!!!!!
[/quote]
and the strange thing is i didn't change anything... :vogel:
Posted:
Sat Oct 22, 2005 10:02 pm
by Paulo
OK.
In the first time I had done in the linux.
In the second time it was in Windows XP.
:vogel: