Page 1 of 1

bug in successive number filter

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 10:23 am
by JOE BLOW
There is a bug in the successive number filter. It will not filter out 3 successive numbers, you press remove or leave, it just leave the 3 successive numbers, IT DOES NOT REMOVE THEM.

THIS FILTER IS LOCATED IN THE FREE EDITION SECTION.

the other successive filters for two and four works, BUT NOT THE THREE. :motz:

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:55 pm
by stan
i don't think there's any bug in that filter. read the filter description here pls:
http://www.expertlotto.com/en/help/en/f ... umbers.htm

PostPosted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 11:24 pm
by Maryland
That's one of my main filters and I have never had a problem.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:15 am
by JOE BLOW
I read it but too complicated to really understand.

"The ticket will remain in the package also when filtering out tickets with three pairs of successive numbers. "

That seems to answer my problems. However I can filter two successive numbers out of all the combinations, and that take care of 3 successive.

i play cash five with only 37 numbers. more work needs to be done on this filter.

PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:09 am
by stan
[quote=JOE BLOW]
more work needs to be done on this filter.
[/quote]

for example?

PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:33 pm
by daniel
[quote=Maryland]
That's one of my main filters and I have never had a problem.
[/quote]

I don't find any problems with it either.

daniel

PostPosted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:37 pm
by CARBOB
[quote=JOE BLOW]
I read it but too complicated to really understand.

"The ticket will remain in the package also when filtering out tickets with three pairs of successive numbers. "

That seems to answer my problems. However I can filter two successive numbers out of all the combinations, and that take care of 3 successive.

i play cash five with only 37 numbers. more work needs to be done on this filter.
[/quote]


"more work needs to be done on this filter." You should not make statements like this without some examples of what you want the changes to be!!! It's too broad of a statement!!