hi stan!
you found the bug?
segment combinations filter
29 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by stan » Wed Oct 29, 2008 5:15 pm
well, i checked the code and it seems to be correct on my side.
do you still have the same problem when creating a new filter or with old saved filters only? in the latter case it should be enough to open the stored filter in the latest, readjust segment sizes and store it again.
do you still have the same problem when creating a new filter or with old saved filters only? in the latter case it should be enough to open the stored filter in the latest, readjust segment sizes and store it again.
Expert Lotto Team
-
stan - Site Admin
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 1:01 pm
by Jerzy » Mon Jan 05, 2009 11:18 am
Stan,
The Build 1064 works fine for me. Thank you.
But could you please make some adjustments in the History Differences filter to improve its versatility.
Could you make the lowest possible Number count 0 to 0 (instead 0 to 1) and the lowest possible Numbers in a single column 0 to 0 (instead 0 to 1). The lowest possible Even numbers count is already 0 to 0.
Why I think it is important? Let's consider the following example:
Most recently, in the column -10 there were no winning numbers in the rows from 5 to 13. It seems to be a rare event, unlikely to be repeated in the near future. Preparing the tickets for the next draw I would like to remove the combinations with numbers which do not appear in the rows 5 to 13 in the column -10.
The right settings in this case should be:
Number count: 0 to 0
History differences: 5 to 13
Numbers in a single column: 0 to 0
Even numbers: 0 to 0
Coumn to use -10
Remove
But the filter does not allow for such setting. These small adjustments would remove this limitation.
The Build 1064 works fine for me. Thank you.
But could you please make some adjustments in the History Differences filter to improve its versatility.
Could you make the lowest possible Number count 0 to 0 (instead 0 to 1) and the lowest possible Numbers in a single column 0 to 0 (instead 0 to 1). The lowest possible Even numbers count is already 0 to 0.
Why I think it is important? Let's consider the following example:
Most recently, in the column -10 there were no winning numbers in the rows from 5 to 13. It seems to be a rare event, unlikely to be repeated in the near future. Preparing the tickets for the next draw I would like to remove the combinations with numbers which do not appear in the rows 5 to 13 in the column -10.
The right settings in this case should be:
Number count: 0 to 0
History differences: 5 to 13
Numbers in a single column: 0 to 0
Even numbers: 0 to 0
Coumn to use -10
Remove
But the filter does not allow for such setting. These small adjustments would remove this limitation.
- Jerzy
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:26 am
, but i wish remove limitation too.by Jerzy » Wed Jan 07, 2009 5:50 am
m4rv1n,
Thank you for discussing this problem. Remove 0-0 = leave 1-11 is right when filtering columns.
But in the History Differences filter we have to deal with more than 11 rows in each column.
For example, there are 26 rows and I want to remove what is included in rows from 3 to 15. It is impossible to use Leave 1-2 and 16-26 at the same time, the filter does not allow for that. And if you leave 1-2 you will remove 3-26 not 3-15. If you leave 16-26 you will remove 1-15.
Thank you for discussing this problem. Remove 0-0 = leave 1-11 is right when filtering columns.
But in the History Differences filter we have to deal with more than 11 rows in each column.
For example, there are 26 rows and I want to remove what is included in rows from 3 to 15. It is impossible to use Leave 1-2 and 16-26 at the same time, the filter does not allow for that. And if you leave 1-2 you will remove 3-26 not 3-15. If you leave 16-26 you will remove 1-15.
- Jerzy
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:26 am
29 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests