In answer to PadawanLotto's remarks about the almost impossible task of correctly identifying which way all 11 columns will go and by how many, I too agree that this is very difficult so there may be another way of looking at it.
I have done some analysis using Expert Lotto imported into Simon69's tool and the resulting difference table imported into Excel.
First, there are 199 rows of 11 columns originated from Expert Lotto Summary Table. This means that there are 2,189 possible outcomes for each difference in the table (199x11), eg, negative, positive or zero movement. Using a recent summary table from the UK Lotto I found that of the 2189 outcomes 1174 were positive, 964 were negative and 51 had zero difference.
Now of the 1174 positve movements 704 of the 1174 were between (1 & 15 incl), this represents 60% of all positive differences. Of the 964 negative difference 660 were between (-1 & -20), this represents 68% of all negative differences.
I can't tell which way each column will go but I suggest that after you have decided which way the column will go and approximately by how many, you then use a Max/Min allowance of +15 and -20 on your value. In 2 tests I have done so far this will leave you with approximately 200,000 to 240,000 tickets in the package which you can then use the other filters to reduce further. If you have correctly identified which way the column will go and the difference is between your max and min values then the winning line is in the package. Incidentally it is not just the winning line, but you will probably find several lines with 5 numbers and the bonus, many tens of lines with 5 numbers and endless lines with 4 and 3 numbers.
This means that you are now trying to reduce around 200,000 tickets instead of almost 14,000,000 with the conventional filters.
To help you decide which way each column will go, I have noticed the following in the analysis made;
79% of the 199 summary rows produced between 3&7 difference values Negative and between 4-8 Positive, (that's 4 out of every 5 draws).
66% of the 199 summary rows produced 4-6 columns Negative and 5-7 columns Positive, that's 2 out of every 3 draws.
Stan, I don't know if you can use this last point in any way. Normally each column difference can go either positive, negative or remain the same, if my maths is correct then this represents 1 in 3^11 = 1 in 177,147 chances of estimating each columns direction correctly.
However, if we just use say any 5 of the 11 (52 times out of 199, 30%, 1 in 3 draws) columns go negative, we reduce the 177,147 combinations to 462, (any 5from 11). Is there any way you can create a filter for this.
Hope some of this is useful to other members following this thread.
Rgds
Red Devil