tdnl46w wrote:No problem, glad to help. In the repeating numbers filter under the Winning Numbers:(Select button), make sure you have [1 latest draws - Mon, Wed, Thu, Fri] selected. Note: There are two separate main lists in EL. The Winning Numbers list, the one with winning draws order with dates(etc.), and the Package list, the list you customize to filter from or compare to the Winning Numbers list.
tdnl46w wrote:To filter those statistics(e.g. 571 to 580), you can use the Match Winning Numbers filter with all draws and Min/Max values. The Min/Max columns values would represent the number of tickets allowed or ranges, in each repeating number counts row(8,9,10). However, you will first have to manually find the exact start and end ranges for the values from those statistics, or the filter may fail to accept/reject any tickets. I tested this using a cut-off date with a full wheel(3,268,760 tickets), and it did keep the winning tickets as long as the ranges were correct.
Example. Draw #1818.
Match Winning Numbers
- Winning Numbers: [All 1,818 draws - Mon, Wed, Thu, Fri]
- under Match check mark [9] and enter values [Min 556 /Max 580]
- Matching Tickets [Accept]
This accepts the next winning ticket(draw #1819) from a full wheel, because its [9] repeating number count range is between 556 to 578.
tdnl46w wrote:Your screenshot looks correct. My system takes about 6 min to complete that filter(AMD FX6300, 8GB ram). There may be something in the unregistered version or your system that is causing it to be slow. I would also check the, Tools->Options->Miscellaneous button->Execution tab, and see if the "Number of threads for long running tasks:" can be set to a higher number.
tdnl46w wrote:My CPU has 6 total threads(3 cores/3 threads). EL can use all 6 as needed when calculating filters/performance. You might try the 30-days trial license(about $4.95 US), that way you can test the registered features. But I can recommend, after using other popular lotto software, EL is by far the best one and worth the full price, and more.
tdnl46w wrote:Using any combination of the 8,9, and 10 statistics for draw #1818, results in at least 1 million tickets accepted from a full wheel. To accept 100 or less tickets I would have to use very narrow ranges for each of those numbers(e.g. 9 = Min/528 to Max/535). These ranges would be subjective. So it appears the other program you were using, had something else it was filtering to get those low ticket counts or, it was using a different winning tickets list.
mimie wrote:I would also like to see how this is applicable to a 6/49 lotto
thanks
Return to Comments, suggestions, feature requests
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest