Elpidio wrote:Pandawan, the unique characteristic of the two groups is that in the first group their is a last digit that is repeated 2 to 3 times. While in the second group the last digit repeats twice or none. Elpidio
PadawanLotto wrote:Ok, what is unique about these number combinations?
1 8 18 25 27
4 14 17 20 29
6 9 17 21 27
6 16 26 28 33
10 15 22 23 33
10 18 25 33 35
Ok, now what is unique about these number combinations?
1 9 13 30 32
2 3 4 11 30
2 12 17 21 36
3 4 23 25 30
3 7 10 26 36
4 7 18 23 27
5 6 15 22 35
7 15 19 23 24
11 16 18 22 30
I'll give you all a few days to work it out.
PadawanLotto wrote:I would like to see a filter built around the idea
stan wrote:please do enter this kind of filter/feature requests here: http://expertlotto.com/issues/
although i read all the posts here it's hard to keep track of feature request threads
PadawanLotto wrote:stan wrote:please do enter this kind of filter/feature requests here: http://expertlotto.com/issues/
although i read all the posts here it's hard to keep track of feature request threads
I went there and couldn't figure out how to post anything there.
The last digit combinations would have to be looked at as a whole 65943 and not as p1=6, p2=5, p3=9, p4=4, p5=3. If you do it positionally then you loose other combinations that you want to keep.Mirel wrote:Not necessarily a new filter for what he Padawan here ! Complex filter , statistical filter and some dexterity make it easy these things !
I have a proposal to add a new way of working for EL 5.
PadawanLotto wrote:The last digit combinations would have to be looked at as a whole 65943 and not as p1=6, p2=5, p3=9, p4=4, p5=3. If you do it positionally then you loose other combinations that you want to keep.Mirel wrote:Not necessarily a new filter for what he Padawan here ! Complex filter , statistical filter and some dexterity make it easy these things !
I have a proposal to add a new way of working for EL 5.
Hey Mirel, how's that complex filter coming along? It's not so easy, I think we are already finding some limitations.Mirel wrote:PadawanLotto wrote:The last digit combinations would have to be looked at as a whole 65943 and not as p1=6, p2=5, p3=9, p4=4, p5=3. If you do it positionally then you loose other combinations that you want to keep.Mirel wrote:Not necessarily a new filter for what he Padawan here ! Complex filter , statistical filter and some dexterity make it easy these things !
I have a proposal to add a new way of working for EL 5.
Exactly!My method made of several parts a whole !!
Return to Comments, suggestions, features requests
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests